Tuesday 7 July 2015

What is a summary of A Magnificent Catastrophe?

A Magnificent Catastrophe by Edward Larson provides a fast-paced, rip-roaring narrative of the 1800 Presidential election—arguably one of the most important in American history. At the start, Larson sets the political background against which this most fractious of elections took place.

In one corner, we have John Adams, President since 1796, and deeply unpopular. A high Federalist and staunch advocate of a strong central government, he is accused by his opponents of seeking to establish on American soil a tyranny greater than that of the British. Adams's reputation as a would-be monarch has been stained further by his authoritarian actions in office, most notoriously in the case of the draconian Alien and Sedition Acts, which Adams (reluctantly) signed into law.


But Adams is unrepentant. His opponents are utopian fanatics and dreamers who fawn over the French Revolution, despite the bloody and tyrannical turn it eventually took. Furthermore, they are shameless demagogues who pander to the basest instincts of the mob to rally support for their dangerous policies. Adams is an unashamed elitist who sees himself as part of a natural aristocracy, born to rule.


Up against Adams we have the formidable figure of Thomas Jefferson. Although he's been Adams's Vice President for the past four years he's been the effective leader of the Republican opposition to his own administration. He sees the Federalist platform as nothing less than a full blown assault on the "Spirit of '76" and the radical conception of republican liberty enshrined in the Declaration of Independence, Jefferson's finest achievement.


The centralizing tendencies of the Federalists are a threat to American liberty. Americans fought a war to free themselves from tyranny, but now the Federalists want to establish a new one, with Adams taking the role of an American King George III. And although Jefferson is a scion of Virginia's elite plantocracy he has a profound commitment to government "of the people," seeing in them a fundamental wisdom, a position that the Federalists regard as sentimental pandering.


This, then, is no ordinary election. The towering, non-partisan figure of George Washington is no more, and the stage is now set for a bitter, vituperative, no-holds-barred political street fight in which every dirty trick in the book will be used by both sides. Larson goes into great detail in setting out just how dirty it got: not just the endless mud-slinging and outright slander from the partisan press, but blatant attempts by the Federalists to suppress the vote in Republican-leaning areas.


Yes, there are profound issues at stake. Both sides genuinely believe that the revolution's legacy is at threat from the other. But Larson recognizes that the struggles were also deeply personal. Many of the various players now at each other's throats in this unfolding drama were once friends and boon companions, comrades in arms during the intense struggle for American independence. The central relationship of the book, that between Adams and Jefferson, perfectly exemplifies this central aspect of political life at the time.


It's an old cliche to say that the past is prologue. But it certainly applies to A Magnificent Catastrophe. We tend to think of bitter partisanship in American politics as a relatively recent phenomenon, but Larson shows this not to be the case at all. The presidential election of 1800 represented an explosion of partisan tendencies that had hitheto been simmering just below the surface. Full-blown party politics had now been born, and the consequences, both good and ill, have been with us ever since.

No comments:

Post a Comment

In "By the Waters of Babylon," under the leadership of John, what do you think the Hill People will do with their society?

The best place to look for evidence in regards to what John's plans are for his people is the final paragraphs of the story. John has re...