Thursday 17 September 2015

Is the launguage formal or informal in Catching Fire?

The terms "informal" and "formal" as they pertain to language reference an author's choice of tone, vocabulary, phrasing, fluency, and syntax. Informal language is much more personal than formal language and can use contractions, slang, colloquialisms, idioms, and phrasal verbs. Formal language, on the other hand, steers clear of colloquial and casual speech, contractions, and idiomatic language. 


Thus, we can deduce that the second book in Suzanne Collins' Hunger Games series, Catching Fire, uses...

The terms "informal" and "formal" as they pertain to language reference an author's choice of tone, vocabulary, phrasing, fluency, and syntax. Informal language is much more personal than formal language and can use contractions, slang, colloquialisms, idioms, and phrasal verbs. Formal language, on the other hand, steers clear of colloquial and casual speech, contractions, and idiomatic language. 


Thus, we can deduce that the second book in Suzanne Collins' Hunger Games series, Catching Fire, uses informal language. On the very first page of the book, we can see that Collins is using contractions ("I can't fight the sun...") and exhibiting other signs of informal language later in the chapter, including slang ("He's something of a whiz with snares..."). The book has a casual tone, and it sounds as if Katniss is confessing her feelings to the reader. Because we're experiencing the events in the present tense and through Katniss' first person narration, the book's voice takes on a very active, adventurous mood and voice--a far cry from the emotional distance and clinical nature of formal language. 

No comments:

Post a Comment

In "By the Waters of Babylon," under the leadership of John, what do you think the Hill People will do with their society?

The best place to look for evidence in regards to what John's plans are for his people is the final paragraphs of the story. John has re...